Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Qualitative Social Work
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ungar, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Qualitative Contributions to Resilience Research

Michael Ungar

Maritime School of Social Work, Dalhousie University, Canada, michael.ungar{at}dal.ca

The use of qualitative methods can make a substantial contribution to our understanding of the construct of resilience. In particular, qualitative research addresses two specific shortcomings noted by resilience researchers: arbitrariness in the selection of outcome variables, and the challenge accounting for the sociocultural context in which resilience occurs. Qualitative research can help to resolve these dilemmas in five ways. Qualitative methods: are well suited to the discovery of the unnamed protective processes relevant to the lived experience of research participants; provide thick description of phenomenon in very specific contexts; elicit and add power to minority ‘voices’ which account for unique localized definitions of positive outcomes; promote tolerance for these localized constructions by avoiding generalization but facilitating transferability of results; and, require researchers to account for their biased standpoints. Reference to exemplars of resilience research will be used to make an argument for the complementarity of research paradigms.

Key Words: arbitrariness of measures • contextualization • qualitative health research • qualitative methods • resilience • risk

Qualitative Social Work, Vol. 2, No. 1, 85-102 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1473325003002001123


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Mens HealthHome page
T. H. Andersen
Speaking About the Unspeakable: Sexually Abused Men Striving Toward Language
American Journal of Men's Health, March 1, 2008; 2(1): 25 - 36.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nutr Clin PractHome page
C. W. Thompson, L. Durrant, A. Barusch, and L. Olson
Fostering Coping Skills and Resilience in Home Enteral Nutrition (HEN) Consumers
Nutr Clin Pract, December 1, 2006; 21(6): 557 - 565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qualitative Social WorkHome page
Editorial
Qualitative Social Work, September 1, 2006; 5(3): 291 - 293.
[PDF]


Home page
Qualitative Social WorkHome page
K. Neander and C. Skott
Important Meetings with Important Persons: Narratives from Families Facing Adversity and their Key Figures
Qualitative Social Work, September 1, 2006; 5(3): 295 - 311.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Youth SocietyHome page
M. Ungar
A Constructionist Discourse on Resilience: Multiple Contexts, Multiple Realities among At-Risk Children and Youth
Youth Society, March 1, 2004; 35(3): 341 - 365.
[Abstract] [PDF]