Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Qualitative Social Work
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Furlong, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Self-Determination and a Critical Perspective in Casework

Promoting a Balance between Interdependence and Autonomy

Mark A. Furlong

La Trobe University, Australia

The principle of `self determination' enjoys a well-deserved position within the theory and practice of social work. While seeking to respect this status, the present exercise begins with a question: might we as clinicians, therapists and case workers risk attenuating our clients' current relationships, and their future prospects for quality connection, if we pursue the goal of self-determination over zealously? In order to explore this question, first, an examination of definitional and historical material is developed which suggests that self-determination was once viewed as more contentious than it is currently, a view that prompts a clearer perception of the ascendant place of the independent self in contemporary conditions. Second, material focusing on the cultural specificity of the concept is presented, the result of which raises further doubt about universalizing the status and legitimacy of self-determination. Third, critical ideas related to practice are developed to identify and problematize the theory of the self that is implicitly performed in casework practices that overly rely on self-determination. A final, brief section canvasses examples of progressive practices that seek to qualify the primacy of self-determination as a goal by introducing complementary goals. Specifically, it is suggested an allegiance to that which emphasizes personal accountability and interpersonal interdependence helps strike a balance between the goal of self-determination and imperatives related to feminist, cultural and ecological values.

Key Words: case-work • `relational-self' • self-determination

Qualitative Social Work, Vol. 2, No. 2, 177-196 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1473325003002002004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?