This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Juhila, K. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Talking Back to Stigmatized Identities

Negotiation of Culturally Dominant Categorizations in Interviews with Shelter Residents

University of Tampere, Finland

The article is based on interviews with 17 shelter residents. The culturally dominant way of categorizing both shelters and their residents is negative, producing stigmatized identities. The questions asked are: do the shelter residents make references to the stigmatized identities and, how do they talk back to these identities? The residents often refer to their `given' identities, but instead of taking them for granted, adopt a critical position towards them. The talking back consists in a negotiation in which one's own identity is compared with the identities of either the shelter or the coresidents. The interviewees stress, on the one hand, the ordinary quality of the shelter and its residents or their own ordinariness. On the other hand, it is also possible to locate in the residents' talking back an identity politics, which attempts to replace the dominant categorizations with different ways of representing the shelter and its residents, ways which are conscious of diversity.

Key Words: category • culturally dominant categorization • identity politics • rhetoric of the ordinary • stigmatized identity • talking back

Qualitative Social Work, Vol. 3, No. 3, 259-275 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1473325004045665


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. S. Abrams and A. Hyun Mapping a Process of Negotiated Identity Among Incarcerated Male Juvenile Offenders Youth Society, September 1, 2009; 41(1): 26 - 52. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. I. Reutter, M. J. Stewart, G. Veenstra, R. Love, D. Raphael, and E. Makwarimba "Who Do They Think We Are, Anyway?": Perceptions of and Responses to Poverty Stigma Qual Health Res, March 1, 2009; 19(3): 297 - 311. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. van Nijnatten Deadlocked Dialogues in Child Welfare Br. J. Soc. Work, October 8, 2008; (2008) bcn133v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Suoninen and E. Virokannas Juvenile and drugs: Fascination of contesting identities Young, February 1, 2008; 16(1): 47 - 65. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Hall and S. White Looking Inside Professional Practice: Discourse, Narrative and Ethnographic Approaches to Social Work and Counselling Qualitative Social Work, December 1, 2005; 4(4): 379 - 390. [PDF]