Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Qualitative Social Work
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooney, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Mothers First, Not Work First

Listening to Welfare Clients in Job Training

Kate Cooney

Boston University, USA, kcooney{at}bu.edu

This article builds on current research on welfare reform examining the perspectives of welfare recipients as they experience the policy enacted at the street level. The study aims to provide more information about the gaps between the assumptions embedded in welfare legislation and the complexity of welfare recipients’ lives. Engaging critical theory, the article examines: (1) the internalization of the schemas undergirding welfare reform using data from focus group interviews; and, (2) the strategic action of welfare recipients using ethnographic data collected from the same welfare-to-work program. Analysis of focus group interviews suggest that schemas embedded in the political discourse surrounding welfare reform are more internalized by the native born, English-speaking welfare clients. The grounded theory analysis identifies two coping strategies invoked by women in the welfare-to-work program: affirming motherhood and strategic acceptance of sanctions. The author concludes with a brief discussion of the potential for broader political action.

Key Words: critical theory • family • grounded theory • welfare reform • work

Qualitative Social Work, Vol. 5, No. 2, 217-235 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1473325006064258


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qualitative Social WorkHome page
P. Y. P. Hong, V. A. Sheriff, and S. R. Naeger
A Bottom-up Definition of Self-sufficiency: Voices from Low-income Jobseekers
Qualitative Social Work, September 1, 2009; 8(3): 357 - 376.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qualitative Social WorkHome page
K. M. Ferguson and N. Islam
Conceptualizing Outcomes with Street-living Young Adults: Grounded Theory Approach to Evaluating the Social Enterprise Intervention
Qualitative Social Work, June 1, 2008; 7(2): 217 - 237.
[Abstract] [PDF]